Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John Øvretveit a Medical Management Centre, Karolinska
Institute, Stockholm Sweden S-40242, b University of
Wisconsin, 610 Walnut Street, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI
53705, USA Correspondence to: J Øvretveit jovret@aol.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Quality programmes consume more resources than any treatment and have potentially greater consequences for patient safety and other clinical outcomes. So why do we know so little about whether they are effective?
Health resources that could be used for clinical care are
increasingly being devoted to large scale programmes to improve the
quality of health care. Examples include national quality initiatives,
hospital programmes, and quality accreditation, assessment, and review
processes. However, little research has been done into their
effectiveness or the conditions needed to implement quality programmes
successfully. This is partly because the programmes are difficult to
evaluate: they change over time, are applied to changing organisations,
and need to be assessed from different perspectives. However, research
can produce valid and useful knowledge about how to make such
programmes work. We describe what research has shown us so far and
highlight how better information can be obtained.
|
Summary points
|
| |
What is a quality programme? |
|---|
Quality programmes are
Read all Rapid Responses